Choosing the Right City in China for a Foreign Invested Enterprise

Choosing where to establish a Foreign Invested Enterprise in China is a strategic decision with long term consequences. While cost savings often dominate early discussions, the city of registration directly affects tax treatment, regulatory exposure, labour risk, operational efficiency, and the ability to scale or exit cleanly.

China should not be viewed as a single, uniform market. National laws are implemented locally, and the same business model can face very different outcomes depending on where it is registered. An apparently low cost location can introduce risks that outweigh any initial savings.

This article explains how to assess Chinese cities realistically, weighing visible cost advantages against less obvious execution risks.

Why City Selection Matters

The city where an FIE is registered influences:

• How tax authorities interpret and enforce rules

• Speed and predictability of regulatory approvals

• Labour law application and dispute outcomes

• Banking access and foreign exchange processing

• Practical enforceability of incentives and local policies

Two entities with identical structures can face very different compliance burdens purely due to location.

Tier One Cities

Higher Cost, Greater Predictability

Common Tier One choices include Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou.

Strengths

• Deep experience with foreign invested enterprises

• More consistent interpretation of national rules

• Mature accounting, legal, and banking infrastructure

• Smoother foreign currency settlement and dividend repatriation

• Higher predictability during audits and inspections

Trade offs

• Higher office rent and salary levels

• Social security contributions based on higher local averages

• Limited or tightly controlled incentive programmes

For many headquarters, trading, and service-based businesses, Tier One cities deliver lower overall risk even with higher headline costs.

Tier Two Cities

Balanced Opportunity with Local Nuance

Typical Tier Two locations include Hangzhou, Suzhou, Nanjing, Chengdu, Wuhan, Xi’an, and Qingdao.

Advantages

• Lower salary and property benchmarks than Tier One cities

• Expanding pools of technical and managerial talent

• Sector specific incentives, particularly for manufacturing and technology

• Improving administrative sophistication

Risks to manage

• Material differences between districts within the same city

• Local tax bureau interpretations that may diverge from national norms

• Incentives often linked to annual revenue, tax, or headcount targets

• Slower or more document intensive foreign exchange processes

Tier Two cities can work well when location choice is matched carefully to business activity and incentives are assessed conservatively.

Lower Tier Cities and Development Zones

Incentives with Execution Risk

Examples include inland provincial capitals, county level cities, and specialised development zones promoted for cost efficiency or industrial clustering.

Typical incentives offered

• Rent free periods or subsidised facilities

• Local tax rebates or refunds

• Cash grants tied to investment or employment levels

Common challenges

• Incentives subject to annual re approval or shifting policy priorities

• Limited experience with complex foreign ownership structures

• Increased scrutiny once profitability emerges

• Difficulty enforcing informal or non statutory commitments

• Higher likelihood of retrospective challenges

Early year savings can be offset by compliance friction, delays, or disputes later in the business lifecycle.

Labour Cost vs Labour Exposure

Lower wages do not automatically reduce employment risk.

Key factors to assess by city include:

• Local labour bureau enforcement practices

• Arbitration panel tendencies in employee disputes

• Practical flexibility around termination and role changes

• Social insurance calculation bases and contribution enforcement

In some lower cost locations, labour rules are applied more rigidly, increasing long term liability.

Tax Incentives vs Tax Certainty

Many incentives promoted at city or district level rely on administrative practice rather than clear statutory support.

Before relying on incentives, investors should assess:

• Whether the incentive is formally published or policy based

• Renewal and approval requirements

• Compatibility with national tax rules

• Clawback risk if conditions or interpretations change

A smaller, predictable incentive in a well established city often delivers better outcomes than a larger but uncertain one.

Operational Practicalities Often Overlooked

Beyond compliance and cost, day to day execution matters:

• Banking efficiency and international payment capability

• Availability of bilingual finance and management staff

• Logistics connectivity and infrastructure quality

• Proximity to customers, suppliers, and decision makers

Operational friction rarely appears in budgets but affects performance over time.

Using Structure to Manage Location Risk

Some businesses adopt hybrid structures to balance cost and control, such as:

• Holding companies in Tier One cities with operating entities elsewhere

• Sales or trading entities in Shanghai or Shenzhen with inland manufacturing

• Regional headquarters combined with project based subsidiaries

This approach can reduce exposure to local execution risk without sacrificing cost efficiency.

---

Woodburn Accountants & Advisors is one of China and Hong Kong’s most trusted business setup advisory firms.

Woodburn Accountants & Advisors is specialized in inbound investment to China and Hong Kong. We focus on eliminating the complexities of corporate services and compliance administration. We help clients with services ranging from trademark registration and company incorporation to the full outsourcing solution for accounting, tax, and human resource services. Our advisory services can be tailor-made based on the companies’ objectives, goals and needs which vary depending on the stage they are at on their journey.

Contact us